|

|

|
Rocky
Shores:
Shipwrecks, Restoration, Monitoring, and
Resource Management
|

|
In
April 20, 1996 the fishing vessel Trinity ran
aground just north of Point Pinos on the Monterey
Peninsula. A salvage operation and studies on both
recovery rates and restoration techniques for the
damaged rocky shore followed this event. In 1999 it
is appropriate to summarize results from these
studies as human impacts to rocky shores have come
to the forefront of Sanctuary management and
significant progress has been made for monitoring
this habitat.

|
The
51-foot, steel hull Trinity ran aground on
the Monterey Peninsula in 1996. Scientists
have been studying recovery rates for the
rocky shore damage caused by this
shipwreck. (Andrew DeVogelaere ©
MBNMS)
|
When the 51-foot, steel
hull seiner ran aground, it crushed granite rock
and scraped off algae and invertebrates. As the
ship was flipped further up the shore during
removal via large tow truck winches, tractor tires
effectively cushioned against further rock
crushing. However, this was a two-day process and,
where the ship and tires were left in the surf
overnight, wave agitation created rubble beds
beneath them. The habitats impacted were lower
intertidal surf grass beds, mid-intertidal mussel
beds, and higher intertidal red algae
assemblages.
Public
Concerns Spur Action in Pacific
Grove
In early May 1999 citizens brought to
the Pacific Grove City Council their
concerns about the perceived declining
health of the local tidepool areas. They
attributed the decline to the impact of
human activities and urged the Council to
push for more aggressive conservation
measures.
It was clear, however, that controversy
existed over the status of the tidepools.
The City Council decided to establish a
Task Force of individuals with interest
and expertise in marine conservation to
address the issue. Prospective members
were invited from marine research
institutions, local government entities,
environmental organizations, and citizens.
The Task Force hoped to bring together
concerned citizens and researchers to
accomplish the common goal of increased
protection.
The City Council specifically directed
the Task Force to focus efforts on
educational opportunities and to identify
research that could clarify the threats to
this special natural resource. The
tidepool areas along the shoreline of
Pacific Grove are already protected—by
the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
and the Pacific Grove Marine Gardens Fish
Refuge and through a city ordinance.
Despite these protective measures,
however, some confusion exists over the
jurisdictional authority and specific
limitations in the area. Initial efforts
of the Task Force sought to clarify
these.
The Task Force's next charge is to
develop educational signs for the
shoreline area to increase awareness of
both the value of these resources and
their protected status. It is also working
with BAY NET, a local volunteer network
affiliated with the Sanctuary, to see if
tidepool interpretation can become part of
that group's program. Lastly, a Task Force
subcommittee is developing a research
program to gather comparative data on
local tidepool areas and to identify
possible explanations for degradation that
might exist.
Sanctuary staff have been intricately
involved with the Task Force, contributing
to many of the successes accomplished so
far. Awareness about marine resources is
high throughout the entire Sanctuary
region and the efforts in Pacific Grove
are simply another step in the ongoing
process of local citizens leading the way
to protect the marine environment that
they value so much.
--Michelle Knight
Chair, Pacific Grove Tidepool Task
Force
|
Recovery within the damaged areas has been slow.
After two years only a few mussels and sea grasses
have colonized disturbed areas in those habitats
and diversity remains low, even though the dominant
red algae are now common in the red algal
assemblage. Other studies in central California
have found that disturbed mussel beds can take more
than ten years to recover. Therefore, while rocky
shore systems experience natural disturbances from
rolling rocks and large waves, physical
disturbances can have long-term impacts to the
organisms living and feeding there, as can humans,
as we visit these sites for social and professional
purposes.
Restoration of rocky
shores is often discussed after oil spills and ship
groundings,or as mitigation for construction
projects. A few restoration efforts have been
experimented with, but the methods were expensive
and had limited success. In particular, moving
individual plants is a lot of work and most die
because they have adapted to a specific
microhabitat and orientation. We transplanted
intact red algal assemblages on boulders into the
rubble beds created during the salvage operation.
In this case (moving assemblages rather than
individual plants), more than 80 percent of the
transplants remained after two years; now we would
like to learn if this method enhances recruitment
by providing a local source of spores.
Ship groundings are
obvious events; however, as human coastal
populations increase, visitation (which is less
obvious) is a growing concern. As expressed at a
past Sanctuary Currents Symposium and in the
scientific literature, lower biodiversity and
smaller size of rocky shore organisms have been
correlated with increased human access in southern
California. In the Sanctuary this year, the
question is being addressed by management agencies
through a draft Master Plan for the Fitzgerald
Marine Reserve, creation of a tidepool advisory
committee by the city of Pacific Grove, and a list
of recommendations by the Sanctuary Advisory
Council's working groups. It is clear that there is
a need to monitor rocky shore systems in order to
distinguish between human impacts and natural
variability, and then to assess the effectiveness
of management practices in cases where they need to
be implemented.
In collaboration with Moss
Landing Marine Laboratories, the Sanctuary
completed a review of forty-eight current and
historic rocky shore monitoring programs within the
Sanctuary boundaries. While this habitat and region
of the world are among the most studied and the
rocky shores maintain relatively high biodiversity,
there remain extensive information gaps on the Big
Sur coast and boulder habitats (it is much easier
to work on flat rock benches). Moreover,
comprehensive long-term monitoring is missing. A
significant component of this work was begun this
year as the UCSC-led Partnership for
Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans set up
fourteen rocky shore monitoring stations, and it
will be working closely with the Sanctuary on
resource management issues.
--Andrew
DeVogelaere
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
|